Crypto entity
Every one of those 1 sits in a single category, market-trends. Of the tracked stories, 1 of 1 also mention Democrats, the most common co-covered peer. We currently track 1 Crypto story that mention Senate, all published on March 16, 2026.
Last mentioned: Mar 24, 2026
Entity pulse
Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.
Every one of those 1 sits in a single category, market-trends. Of the tracked stories, 1 of 1 also mention Democrats, the most common co-covered peer. We currently track 1 Crypto story that mention Senate, all published on March 16, 2026. Each carries 2 original sources on average.
Computed from the 1 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 14 Crypto stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.
Coverage cohort
Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Senate. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.
The Flip
Democrats officially overtake Republicans as the favorites for Senate control on both major platforms.
Odds Narrow
The gap between Democratic and Republican odds closes to within a margin of error on Polymarket.
Iran Tensions Escalate
Geopolitical risks in the Middle East begin to dominate the news cycle and global markets.
Republican Dominance
Republicans hold a steady 60% probability of taking the Senate on most prediction platforms.
Traders on Kalshi and Polymarket have sharply reversed their bets on U.S. Senate control, with Democrats now favored over Republicans. This significant shift in political sentiment is largely attributed to escalating geopolitical tensions in Iran, which have reshaped the risk landscape for bettors.
Senate is linked from 1 story on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.
See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.
