Brevan Howard Crypto Fund Slumps 30% in Worst Year Since Inception

The institutional investment landscape for digital assets faced a sobering reality check this week as reports emerged that Brevan Howard’s flagship cryptocurrency vehicle, the BH Digital Asset Fund, suffered a nearly 30% loss in 2025. According to data first obtained by the Financial Times, the fund ended the year down 29.5%, marking its most significant annual drawdown since its inception in 2021. This performance is particularly jarring when viewed against the backdrop of the broader market; Bitcoin, the industry’s primary benchmark, declined by a relatively modest 6% over the same twelve-month period. The resulting 23.5% performance gap highlights a profound divergence between the fund’s active management strategies and the underlying price action of the market’s largest asset.

Brevan Howard, a firm synonymous with sophisticated global macro trading, launched BH Digital with the intent of applying institutional-grade risk management and tactical expertise to the volatile crypto sector. At its height, the division became a symbol of the bridge between Wall Street and Web3, attracting significant capital from pension funds and endowments. However, the 2025 results suggest that the complexities of the crypto-macro environment may have overwhelmed even seasoned traditional traders. The scale of the underperformance implies that the fund likely maintained heavy exposure to mid-cap altcoins or decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, which historically suffer more aggressive liquidity exits than Bitcoin during periods of market cooling.

“

The institutional investment landscape for digital assets faced a sobering reality check this week as reports emerged that Brevan Howard’s flagship cryptocurrency vehicle, the BH Digital Asset Fund, suffered a nearly 30% loss in 2025.

The timing of this loss coincides with a pivotal shift in how institutional investors access the crypto market. With the proliferation of spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, the barrier to entry for passive exposure has vanished, offering low-cost alternatives to high-fee hedge funds. For an active manager charging traditional 2 and 20 fees, the justification for such a cost structure rests entirely on the ability to generate alpha or provide downside protection. In 2025, BH Digital appeared to do neither, instead magnifying the market's downside. This failure to hedge effectively during what insiders described as a terrible year for the industry could trigger a wave of redemptions as limited partners re-evaluate the value proposition of active crypto management.

Furthermore, the fund's struggle reflects a broader trend within the digital asset ecosystem where liquidity has become increasingly concentrated in top-tier assets. While Bitcoin showed resilience, the long tail of the market—where many hedge funds seek outsized returns—faced a valuation reset. If BH Digital was positioned in illiquid tokens or complex yield-generating strategies that broke down during the 2025 rout, the difficulty of exiting those positions without further depressing prices would have exacerbated the fund's losses. This scenario serves as a cautionary tale for other institutional desks that have pivoted toward high-beta crypto strategies without fully accounting for the unique liquidity risks inherent in non-Bitcoin assets.

The psychological impact on the institutional sector cannot be overstated. Brevan Howard was seen as one of the most reliable entries for traditional finance into the crypto space. If a firm with its pedigree and resources can underperform the benchmark by such a wide margin, it raises questions about the viability of the crypto hedge fund model in its current form. Investors may begin to favor simpler, more transparent strategies or direct exposure through regulated products rather than complex, multi-strategy vehicles that carry high operational and management costs.

Looking toward the remainder of 2026, the industry will be watching for a potential pivot in Brevan Howard’s digital strategy. The firm may be forced to consolidate its holdings, focusing more on core infrastructure and market leaders rather than speculative altcoin plays. There is also the risk of a contagion of sentiment, where the poor performance of a marquee name like Brevan Howard leads to a broader cooling of institutional interest in active crypto hedge funds. As the market matures, the demand for transparency and proven risk-mitigation techniques will likely supersede the hunt for pure price appreciation, forcing a fundamental evolution in how digital asset portfolios are constructed and managed.