Crypto used as $100K ransom in high-profile Pakistan gangrape case

For the crypto community, this gruesome case is another stark example of digital currencies being weaponized for serious crime—this time with a political twist. The demand for “the computer with the money” and the alleged transfer of $100,000 in cryptocurrency as a ransom underscore how easily crypto can be used to extort victims, especially when holdings are known. Yet the very public nature of the blockchain could enable law enforcement to follow the money and expose the perpetrators, offering a rare chance to demonstrate that crypto is not a perfect shield for criminals—if Pakistani authorities can marshal the necessary forensic resources.

The gangrape and abduction case of two foreign women in Pakistan has taken a significant turn as investigators zero in on a cryptocurrency-related financial dispute as a possible motive. The high-profile nature of the case is amplified by the involvement of Muhammad Raza Dar, a relative—reportedly the grandson—of Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, among the accused. This development emerged after one of the survivors gave a sworn statement before a judicial magistrate under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, providing chilling details of the ordeal and the alleged role of crypto assets in the crime.

“

The demand for “the computer with the money” and the alleged transfer of $100,000 in cryptocurrency as a ransom underscore how easily crypto can be used to extort victims, especially when holdings are known.

The survivor alleged that Raza Dar and armed accomplices broke into the residence where she and her friend were staying, restrained them, and locked them in a room. The attackers repeatedly demanded access to a computer containing cryptocurrency funds, asking “where the computer with the money was” and forcing the victim to reveal that it was in a green bag. The demand for digital assets—rather than cash or traditional valuables—points to a premeditated targeting of cryptocurrency holdings, suggesting a prior knowledge of the victims’ digital wealth or a related dispute. The survivor claimed she was struck on the head and that the assailants threatened death unless the funds were handed over: “He told me if we gave them the money, we would live. If we didn’t, they would kill us.”

A central financial detail in the testimony is the alleged payment of USD 100,000 for the victims’ release. According to the survivor, Raza Dar used her mobile phone to contact her network to arrange money. After initial attempts failed, the mother of the second woman informed the suspects that the ransom had been arranged, and upon confirming receipt—apparently in cryptocurrency—the women were told they were free. The use of crypto in ransom payments highlights the increasing intersection of digital currencies with serious crimes, where pseudonymity and cross-border mobility complicate law enforcement efforts.

The survivor also graphically described sexual assault by two of the accused while a third stood guard. She recounted how they laughed, slapped her, and ordered silence when she cried. These details elevate the case from a property crime to a brutal act of violence, intensifying public and legal scrutiny.

The Pakistani judicial system is now poised to weigh the crypto angle in court. The statement recorded under Section 164 is a critical piece of evidence because it is given before a magistrate and carries significant legal weight. However, proving the existence and transfer of cryptocurrency will be challenging, requiring digital forensics to trace wallets, transactions, and potentially unmask addresses involved. Pakistani authorities have limited experience with crypto-related crime, and this case may set an important precedent for how such offences are investigated and prosecuted in the country.

From a regulatory perspective, the case could accelerate Pakistan’s ongoing, albeit cautious, approach to cryptocurrency regulation. The State Bank of Pakistan has historically maintained a restrictive stance, and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has urged tighter controls on crypto to combat money laundering and terror financing. This incident provides a concrete, high-profile example for advocates of stricter regulation, potentially influencing policy discourse.

The political dimension cannot be ignored. Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar is a senior figure in the government, and his relative’s alleged involvement risks political fallout. Opposition parties and media may use the case to attack the government, while the administration will need to balance transparent justice with political damage control. The case also tests the judiciary’s independence in a sensitive matter.