DeFi Neutral 5 Based on a press release

Open USD's Zero-Fee Minting Challenges Stablecoins as $7B Rails Grow

The HTX Ventures report says Open USD (OUSD) could shift stablecoin economics from issuer-only reserve yields to participant revenue sharing. Its Open Standard framework, launched June 30, 2026, allows enterprises to mint and redeem OUSD with zero fees and no volume limits.

· 4 min read · Verified by 2 sources ·

Crypto briefing

Key takeaways

5 impact
Neutralsentiment
2sources
4min read
  1. The HTX Ventures report says Open USD (OUSD) could shift stablecoin economics from issuer-only reserve yields to participant revenue sharing.
  2. Its Open Standard framework, launched June 30, 2026, allows enterprises to mint and redeem OUSD with zero fees and no volume limits.
Drawn from
  • prnewswire.com
  • finanznachrichten.de

In this briefing

Mentioned

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1HTX Ventures released the report 'Open Infrastructure, Closed Financial Rails: Open USD, Revenue Redistribution, and Participant Governance' on Aug 13, 2026, via PRNewswire.
  2. 2Open USD (OUSD) was unveiled on June 30, 2026, according to the release.
  3. 3Visa's stablecoin settlement pilot reached an annualized run rate of approximately $7 billion by April 2026 across nine blockchains.
  4. 4Under Open Standard's framework, enterprises can mint and redeem OUSD free of charge and without volume limits; the framework charges a small management fee.
  5. 5The report states that stablecoin issuers currently retain all reserve yields from cash and short-term Treasury allocations.
  6. 6Swift, the Canton Network, Fnality, and Project Agorá are exploring tokenized deposits and central bank money settlement in shared environments.

Analysis

Open Standard bull case
  • Zero-fee minting and redemption eliminate enterprise cost barriers
  • Revenue sharing can align incentives across exchanges, wallets, and market makers
  • Participant governance could decentralize control beyond incumbent issuers
Open Standard risks
  • Adoption and reserve transparency are unproven
  • Incumbent issuers may resist margin compression and regulatory complexity
  • Source is promotional and lacks independent usage or audit data

Analysis

For DeFi builders and token holders, the stablecoin fight is moving from technical rails to economic control. HTX Ventures' Open USD analysis argues that after OUSD's June 30, 2026 launch, the key contest is over how reserve yields and governance rights are allocated among issuers, exchanges, wallets, and market makers. If Open Standard's zero-fee minting model gains adoption, it could redraw how stablecoin networks compensate their participants.

On Aug 13, 2026, HTX Ventures, the global investment arm of crypto exchange HTX, published a report titled 'Open Infrastructure, Closed Financial Rails: Open USD, Revenue Redistribution, and Participant Governance.' The report, distributed via PRNewswire and syndicated by FinanzNachrichten, examines the economic and governance shifts around Open USD (OUSD), a stablecoin framework unveiled June 30, 2026. Its core claim is that stablecoin technical infrastructure has already been opened by public blockchains, but the economic layer remains closed: issuers capture reserve yields while distribution partners bear integration, compliance, and liquidity costs.

Second, the convergence of Visa, Swift, Canton Network, Fnality, and Project Agorá suggests that tokenized settlement may become a core back-office infrastructure rather than a crypto-only phenomenon.

The report argues stablecoins have outgrown their original use as settlement tools in crypto trading. They are now used in cross-border payments, corporate treasury management, and institutional back-office clearing. It cites Visa's stablecoin settlement pilot reaching an annualized run rate of approximately $7 billion by April 2026 across nine blockchains. The report also points to Swift, the Canton Network, Fnality, and Project Agorá as examples of efforts to settle tokenized deposits and central bank money within shared environments. This expansion increases the total economic value of the ecosystem but does not, on its own, change who captures that value.

Under the current model, according to the report, stablecoin issuers mint tokens against user dollars and allocate the underlying reserves into cash and short-term U.S. Treasuries. All reserve yield accrues to the issuer. Yet the stablecoin user experience depends on exchanges, wallets, payment companies, banks, custodians, and market makers. Those entities bear integration, compliance, and liquidity costs. They currently earn revenue mainly through bilateral commercial agreements, where bargaining power is a function of user scale. The result is a mismatch: the technical rails are open, but economic benefits are concentrated in a small number of issuers and scaled distributors, while smaller or newer infrastructure providers may be uncompensated for their integration work.

The report's central subject, Open Standard's OUSD, is described as a framework in which enterprises can mint and redeem OUSD free of charge and without volume limits. Rather than keeping all reserve income, Open Standard charges a small management fee and, according to the release, redistributes the remaining yield through its participant model. If executed at scale, this would invert the incumbent stablecoin revenue structure. Issuers that rely on retaining all reserve income could face pressure to share spread, while corporate users, wallets, exchanges, and market makers could be compensated more directly for distribution, compliance, and liquidity provision.

What to Watch

For financial markets, the significance is twofold. First, if stablecoin reserve sharing becomes standard, the profitability of large stablecoin issuers could compress while corporate treasury demand could increase because holding yield-bearing stablecoins becomes more attractive. Second, the convergence of Visa, Swift, Canton Network, Fnality, and Project Agorá suggests that tokenized settlement may become a core back-office infrastructure rather than a crypto-only phenomenon. Open USD's revenue-sharing and governance claims, however, remain unverified. The entire cluster consists of a press release from HTX Ventures and a syndicated republication; no independent reporting, audits, or usage data accompany the framework's assertions. As with any promotional research from an investment arm, readers should treat statements about zero fees, revenue redistribution, and participant governance as claims by the issuer rather than established market facts.

Looking ahead, the report correctly identifies a real fault line: the next phase of stablecoin competition will be fought over control rights and the allocation of economic benefits, not just which blockchain settles a transaction. Whether OUSD gains meaningful volume depends on enterprise adoption, regulatory treatment of reserve-sharing arrangements, and whether incumbents respond by adjusting their own fee and yield structures. For investors and market participants, the measurable signals to watch will be OUSD circulation, disclosed reserve composition and yield splits, and whether Visa's $7 billion run rate continues to expand across chains. The technical layer may have opened in 2026; the economic layer is now the contest.

Timeline

Timeline

  1. Visa stablecoin settlement pilot reaches $7B annualized run rate

  2. Open USD (OUSD) unveiled

  3. HTX Ventures publishes report

Source cluster

Primary reporting

2articles

Cite This Page

"Open USD's Zero-Fee Minting Challenges Stablecoins as $7B Rails Grow." Crypto Intelligence Brief, August 13, 2026. https://getcryptobrief.com/story/open-usd-revenue-redistribution-defi

How we covered this story

Every story in our crypto coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the crypto space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.

Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.